Katie | 23 | INTP | Slytherin

fyeahamyacker:

sansasnark:

Amy Acker as Sarah Manning, Alison Hendrix, Cosima Niehaus, Rachel Duncan, Helena and Beth Childs

What kind of TV does Amy Acker like to watch?
Oh, geez…. The problem with making TV is you don’t get as much time to watch it as you would like to. But I love Orphan Black — Tatiana Maslany is great X



love me when I least deserve it, because that’s when I really need it.

love me when I least deserve it, because that’s when I really need it.

(Source: dinwos)


Well...
  • [Comment From starwarsfan013]: what are your favorite books?
  • andrew_garfield: starwarsfan, i love catcher in the rye, amazing adventures of kavalier and clay. i am reading a book by elia kazan right now, which is great.
  • [Comment From Alice]: Gosh, Andrew, we have similar taste in books
  • andrew_garfield: alice, cool, maybe we should meet and get married
  • Jesse_Eisenberg: i also like those books!

  • me every time I watch The Social Network: maybe this time they'll talk things through

peculiarnuisance:

markofthespiderman:




housecatlivingrentfree:

  #we are all insane #this is a picture of a *chair* #this is all it takes to break us down

On Poisoned Apples, the “Great YA Debate,” and the Death of the Patriarchy

juliusschmidt:

anneursu:

My friend Christine Heppermann’s book POISONED APPLES: POEMS FOR YOU MY PRETTY released this week. This collection is an unabashedly feminist look at girls, body image, and eating disorders told through the lens of fairy tales, designed for young adults. 

The book is arriving at an interesting cultural moment; when the already ridiculous should-adults-read-YA conversation, has taken a bizarre turn. Did you know the patriarchy was dead? It must be true, as I learned that by reading it in an essay printed in the newsletter of the patriarchy.

For New York Times columnist A.O. Scott, the patriarchy’s demise is not even significant in and of itself; no, it symbolizes a greater issue: “The Death of Adulthood in American Culture.” Now, the equation of the death of the patriarchy and the death of adulthood is a problematic one at best, and if you’re expecting Scott to address the troubling implication here or at the very least explain himself, well, he won’t. Because apparently the fact that patriarchy=adulthood, too, is something we can all agree on.

Part of the essay takes on YA, of course, because apparently we have to do this again. Scott pats the head of everyone who gets offended when people put them down for reading YA, saying that of course they bristle; people don’t like it when someone else attacks, in his words, “the juvenile pleasures of empowered cultural consumers.” Scott also spends a lot of time talking about women in the arts, ascribing to them some kind of plucky-but-aimless adolescent rebellion:

 Why should boys be the only ones with the right to revolt? Not that the new girls are exactly Thelma and Louise. Just as the men passed through the stage of sincere rebellion to arrive at a stage of infantile refusal, so, too, have the women progressed by means of regression.

He later asserts that the predecessors of the “modern man-boy” had “something to fight for:”

…A moral or political impulse underlying their postures of revolt. The founding brothers in Philadelphia cut loose a king; Huck Finn exposed the dehumanizing lies of America slavery; Lenny Bruce battled censorship. When Marlon Brando’s Wild One was asked what he was rebelling against, his thrilling, nihilistic response was “Whaddaya got?” The modern equivalent would be “…”

Author Laura Ruby, in her response to this essay, says it well: "The implication that our art, our characters, our stories, represent nothing but a certain adolescent pleasure in bucking the system, that only white men can be truly serious in their subversion, is as laughable as it is enraging. "

Read More


Here’s a sure-fire way to know that you hate women: when an incident of intimate partner violence in which a man knocks a woman unconscious gains national attention and every question or comment you think to make has to do with her behavior, you really hate women. Like, despise.

There is no other explanation. There is no “I need all the facts.” There is no excuse. You hate women. Own it.

Now, you probably don’t believe you hate women. You probably honestly think you’re being an objective observer whose only interest is the truth. You are delusional.

We have this problem in our discourse around the most important challenges we face where we feel we have to be “fair to both sides.” But sometimes, one of those sides is subjugation and oppression. If you’re OK with legitimizing that side in the interest of “fairness,” you’re essentially saying you’re OK with oppression as a part of the human condition. That’s some hateful shit.



Oh man, that sucks! Maybe someone has a download?

i hope so.  the sad thing is it’s not just that, you know? every time i’m in the mood to read tsn and i go through my old rec lists, i feel like half of the fics i click on are gone.  

actually, speaking of all of this, i know in grander schemes than this got taken down, but i could’ve sworn the author put it up again somewhere.  i just can’t find it for the life of me.


things i’ve just discovered and am trying not to be ridiculously upset over: you only live twice is apparently off the internet